<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blender 3D 2.50 Alpha 0 for architectural visualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/11/blender-3d-2-50-alpha-0-for-architectural-visualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/11/blender-3d-2-50-alpha-0-for-architectural-visualization/</link>
	<description>Using Blender 3D for Architectural Visualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:06:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/11/blender-3d-2-50-alpha-0-for-architectural-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-8545</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=1019#comment-8545</guid>
		<description>I agree and it&#039;s very clear: Alpha is lower than Beta and even  Beta versions NEVER are for production use.

I&#039;m curious how the developlement of the full integration of V-Ray is going on :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree and it&#8217;s very clear: Alpha is lower than Beta and even  Beta versions NEVER are for production use.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious how the developlement of the full integration of V-Ray is going on <img src='http://www.blender3darchitect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mzsade</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/11/blender-3d-2-50-alpha-0-for-architectural-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-8540</link>
		<dc:creator>mzsade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=1019#comment-8540</guid>
		<description>No .deb package? This is an outrage! (Heh, Heh.) just kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No .deb package? This is an outrage! (Heh, Heh.) just kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/11/blender-3d-2-50-alpha-0-for-architectural-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-8534</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=1019#comment-8534</guid>
		<description>I agree.  The alpha 0 release is cool but not complete.  Even though I want to make the jump, (especially if I am going to do tutorials,) I am uncomfortable with the new (and incomplete) environment.  So, Blender 2.49b it is for now, with keeping up and learning on 2.5, and probably some projects and tutorials as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  The alpha 0 release is cool but not complete.  Even though I want to make the jump, (especially if I am going to do tutorials,) I am uncomfortable with the new (and incomplete) environment.  So, Blender 2.49b it is for now, with keeping up and learning on 2.5, and probably some projects and tutorials as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/11/blender-3d-2-50-alpha-0-for-architectural-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-8533</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=1019#comment-8533</guid>
		<description>I have been using Blender to do visualisations for about a year and a half after I learnt using great video tutorials by Vaclav (http://blender-house.spaces.live.com/) having come from Vectorworks. As per the tutorials I import the plan as a background image and &#039;trace over&#039; it. In 2.50 I find this technique doesn&#039;t work because the background image changes size and jumps all over the place when you zoom in and out. I am on an Intel Mac. So I use both. On the whole, 2.50 is great though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Blender to do visualisations for about a year and a half after I learnt using great video tutorials by Vaclav (<a href="http://blender-house.spaces.live.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blender-house.spaces.live.com/</a>) having come from Vectorworks. As per the tutorials I import the plan as a background image and &#8216;trace over&#8217; it. In 2.50 I find this technique doesn&#8217;t work because the background image changes size and jumps all over the place when you zoom in and out. I am on an Intel Mac. So I use both. On the whole, 2.50 is great though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3dRend</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/11/blender-3d-2-50-alpha-0-for-architectural-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-8531</link>
		<dc:creator>3dRend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=1019#comment-8531</guid>
		<description>Blender for my hobby, so I quietly moved to 2.5. Bad that there Yafaray and the interface is not quite accustomed.
Sorry for my English</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blender for my hobby, so I quietly moved to 2.5. Bad that there Yafaray and the interface is not quite accustomed.<br />
Sorry for my English</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

