<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Converting CAD files for architectural modeling in Blender 3D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/09/converting-cad-files-for-architectural-modeling-in-blender-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/09/converting-cad-files-for-architectural-modeling-in-blender-3d/</link>
	<description>Using Blender 3D for Architectural Visualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RV</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/09/converting-cad-files-for-architectural-modeling-in-blender-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7716</link>
		<dc:creator>RV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=778#comment-7716</guid>
		<description>..or use &quot;brickcad&quot; as a good alternative for autocad.
Brickscad does not cost alot and it can open dwg files of the newest autocad version in a native way and hast most of autocads features.
I guess if you count the hours of problems you have with buggy freeware software brickscad is worth the money it costs.

It&#039;s just a guess, I&#039;ve never tried the full workflow in a professional, economic environment with it ;-)

Kind regards
Alain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..or use &#8220;brickcad&#8221; as a good alternative for autocad.<br />
Brickscad does not cost alot and it can open dwg files of the newest autocad version in a native way and hast most of autocads features.<br />
I guess if you count the hours of problems you have with buggy freeware software brickscad is worth the money it costs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a guess, I&#8217;ve never tried the full workflow in a professional, economic environment with it <img src='http://www.blender3darchitect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Alain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FishB8</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/09/converting-cad-files-for-architectural-modeling-in-blender-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7649</link>
		<dc:creator>FishB8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=778#comment-7649</guid>
		<description>That DXF import function you are using is very old and broken.

The python based DXF import just a couple items down in the import list is much much better, supports a lot more features (including 3D dxf files) and is offers a lot more options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That DXF import function you are using is very old and broken.</p>
<p>The python based DXF import just a couple items down in the import list is much much better, supports a lot more features (including 3D dxf files) and is offers a lot more options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/09/converting-cad-files-for-architectural-modeling-in-blender-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7484</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=778#comment-7484</guid>
		<description>..or use &quot;brickcad&quot; as a good alternative for autocad.
Brickscad does not cost alot and it can open dwg files of the newest autocad version in a native way and hast most of autocads features.
I guess if you count the hours of problems you have with buggy freeware software brickscad is worth the money it costs.

It&#039;s just a guess, I&#039;ve never tried the full workflow in a professional, economic environment with it ;-)

Kind regards
Alain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..or use &#8220;brickcad&#8221; as a good alternative for autocad.<br />
Brickscad does not cost alot and it can open dwg files of the newest autocad version in a native way and hast most of autocads features.<br />
I guess if you count the hours of problems you have with buggy freeware software brickscad is worth the money it costs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a guess, I&#8217;ve never tried the full workflow in a professional, economic environment with it <img src='http://www.blender3darchitect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Alain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucklucky</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/09/converting-cad-files-for-architectural-modeling-in-blender-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7482</link>
		<dc:creator>lucklucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=778#comment-7482</guid>
		<description>Just to say thanks to your great blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to say thanks to your great blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/09/converting-cad-files-for-architectural-modeling-in-blender-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-7480</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=778#comment-7480</guid>
		<description>There is a certain problem with a 3D solid objects import. actually there is no problem, 3D stuff is just ignored. And with complex spacious structures (crazy stair cases in my previous work) 2D only import is not so useful. 

Well some times simple 3DSOUT command helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a certain problem with a 3D solid objects import. actually there is no problem, 3D stuff is just ignored. And with complex spacious structures (crazy stair cases in my previous work) 2D only import is not so useful. </p>
<p>Well some times simple 3DSOUT command helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
