Comments on: Render speed test with LuxRender 0.6 RC5 for interior design http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/08/render-speed-test-with-luxrender-0-6-rc5-for-interior-design/ Using Blender 3D for Architectural Visualization Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:32:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: ralmon http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/08/render-speed-test-with-luxrender-0-6-rc5-for-interior-design/comment-page-1/#comment-11715 ralmon Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:37:34 +0000 http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=661#comment-11715 Alain has a very big point. For most part, realism isn't really that big but speed is. Even if that "realistic" renderer is 50% less realistic than the best out there but is 200% faster it would be be much desirable. Alain has a very big point. For most part, realism isn’t really that big but speed is. Even if that “realistic” renderer is 50% less realistic than the best out there but is 200% faster it would be be much desirable.

]]> By: Alain http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/08/render-speed-test-with-luxrender-0-6-rc5-for-interior-design/comment-page-1/#comment-6932 Alain Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:50:55 +0000 http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=661#comment-6932 For professional Architectur Vizualisation I can only recommend to wait for the full integration of V-Ray into Blender. V-Ray is not for free, but if you consider how mutch time you loose by rendering with buggy unbiased renderengines, then you must admit that this "5% more realism" of unbiased renderengies isn't worth of it. I still give Blender a chance for a prof. enviroment, cause I don't like 3d max. Cinema 4D is mutch more userfriendly than Max and could be an alternative as well. But all those Open Source unbiased renderer mostly are unusable for prof. firms. I see mostly students, idialists and hobbiests users in those forums who do not really know what the today market wants. Kind regards Alain For professional Architectur Vizualisation I can only recommend to wait for the full integration of V-Ray into Blender. V-Ray is not for free, but if you consider how mutch time you loose by rendering with buggy unbiased renderengines, then you must admit that this “5% more realism” of unbiased renderengies isn’t worth of it.

I still give Blender a chance for a prof. enviroment, cause I don’t like 3d max. Cinema 4D is mutch more userfriendly than Max and could be an alternative as well. But all those Open Source unbiased renderer mostly are unusable for prof. firms.
I see mostly students, idialists and hobbiests users in those forums who do not really know what the today market wants.

Kind regards
Alain

]]> By: Allan Brito http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/08/render-speed-test-with-luxrender-0-6-rc5-for-interior-design/comment-page-1/#comment-6922 Allan Brito Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:20:59 +0000 http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=661#comment-6922 Hi Gagar, I`m aware of that. That was only a way to justify the better quality of the image rendered with RC4. :) Regards Hi Gagar,

I`m aware of that. That was only a way to justify the better quality of the image rendered with RC4. :)

Regards

]]> By: Gagar http://www.blender3darchitect.com/2009/08/render-speed-test-with-luxrender-0-6-rc5-for-interior-design/comment-page-1/#comment-6921 Gagar Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:51:22 +0000 http://www.blender3darchitect.com/?p=661#comment-6921 Typically, comparing the number of samples per second between two different versions of a renderer (or two different renderers) is not a good metric: It says nothing of the samples' quality. The quality of the render after n minutes is a much better metric, and indeed the only one that counts. Typically, comparing the number of samples per second between two different versions of a renderer (or two different renderers) is not a good metric: It says nothing of the samples’ quality.

The quality of the render after n minutes is a much better metric, and indeed the only one that counts.

]]>